Discover, fork, and publish structured frameworks for the decisions you make every week.
How it works
Search a real problem and find the frameworks people already trust.
Start from one that's close, then make it yours — rename, reshape, refine.
Share your version. The framework it grew from is always credited.
Featured
Sort what you know about a decision into four buckets so the gaps become obvious.
Use when Use it early, when a group needs to pool what it collectively knows before choosing a direction — entering a market, responding to a competitor, or opening annual planning. It is most valuable when the people in the room hold different pieces of the picture and have never assembled them in one place.
Avoid when Avoid it when you need a decision rather than an inventory: SWOT ranks nothing and will not tell you what to do. It rewards confident assertion, so it degrades badly in rooms with a strong seniority gradient. And it is a snapshot — for anything fast-moving it dates quickly, and a stale SWOT presented as current is worse than none.
Strip a problem back to what must be true, then rebuild — instead of copying what exists.
Use when Use it when an industry's costs or practices have been stable for a long time without obvious justification, when you are entering a field as an outsider and lack the incumbents' assumptions, or when repeated incremental attempts have all failed and the problem may be framed wrongly.
Lineage
When something is close but not quite right, fork it, adapt it, and publish your version — and the original is always credited. That is how good thinking compounds, in the open.
How forking works →Pre-Mortem Sprint
the original
Your team's version
a fork
Solo founder's version
a fork
Browse by category
Every framework here started as one person's way of getting unstuck. Write down yours, and let others build on it.
Create a frameworkAvoid when Avoid it for routine decisions — it is slow, effortful, and analogy is right most of the time. It is also a common vehicle for arrogance: reasoning from first principles while lacking domain knowledge tends to rediscover why the convention exists, expensively. If experts cannot explain why a practice exists, that is worth investigating; if they can, listen.